Bug in <url> (was Re: your mail)

[Denis Barbier <nospam@thanx>]

On 10 Sep 1999, Fritz Zaucker wrote:

> > But now i believe that <url> is an help tag, and so is not intended
> > to be fully RFC compliant. I will remove the last character of the URL
> > if one of ['"?!.;:)>] (brackets are not included in this list).
> > Any comment?
> 
> How about an optional argument to like <url RFC> that make's the tag
> RFC-compliant and by default make it "reasonable" as you suggested?

Sounds good.

> To be honest, I don't like non-compliant approaches very much, but it
> just seems silly this way.

Agree.

And what about the <URL:http://....> notation, i believe this is the
standard and so should be written by the <url> tag. If there is no
objection, i'll implement it

-- 
Denis Barbier
WML Maintainer

______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com