[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [HELP] Replacement of wml_p2_mhc
- From: Jan Holler <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 19:26:43 +0100 (CET)
Hi Denis
great, things are still progressing.
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:27:24 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
> help to develop and maintain it. Here is my TODO list on this project:
> a priority. I believe now that it is best to have a robust and easy
> to learn syntax.
i would go for the robustness first. who tells us what easy
means.
> Compatibility with older templates within WML is
> done via wml::sys::bootmhc.
did i miss something? i thought i had read about wml 2.x.
is your work part of it?
> on Meta-HTML syntax. For instance, Meta-HTML has 2 macros to
> define new tags : <define-tag> and <define-container>. I prefer
> having only one, and containers could be defined with
> <define-tag foo endtag=required> or <define-tag foo type=complex>.
i don't think that is very important. but if you invent the var
endtag one can migrate smoothly from the old to the new
style.
> * Write documentation. My version does not include documentation yet,
> it's why there is no URL in this post.
what is missing?
> * Enhance C portability (mp4h has been tested on Linux and SunOS 5.6)
release it! others may take care of that.
> * Optimization
have a running version first. you said it's faster than the
original anyway.
> * If needed, write a converter to ease upgrading template files.
> * Enhance wml::sys::bootmhc for maximum backward compatibility.
what are the main differences?
bye
-jan
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager majordomo@engelschall.com