Re: BUG REPORT: Test-Suite 100% failed on Debian 2.1

[Jan Ulrich Hasecke <nospam@thanx>]

Hi Stephane!

Stephane Bortzmeyer schrieb:

> No, don't. No. NO! NOT THE GUN!!!, NO!

But my knife is blunt. ;-)

> > I tried wml-1.7.4 and wml-SNAP after upgrading my Debian 2.1 perl to
> > unstable. 
> 
> As its name says, 'unstable' is for the brave.

Maybe I should encourage myself.;-)  I upgraded because wml-1.7.4. does
not want to compile with the slink perl, because of an old Getopt. 

> There is a Debian package of wml, which is well-maintained (and is used for 
> www.debian.org). There is no need to do it yourself.

wml-1.7.4? apt-get does not find an wml-1.7.4 

Mh, I'll try again with wml*

> It seems many Perl parts are missing. Are you sure you installed 'perl' and 
> not only the default 'perl-base'?

Sure? Never! I am using dselect and apt-get only since the new
century, so how could I be sure? 

> > $ perl --version
> > This is perl, version 5.004_05 built for i386-linux  
> 
> 'unstable' has Perl 5.005 by default, which makes me wonder if you really use 
> 'unstable'.

This is my /etc/apt/source.list:

deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free

I wonder that ./configure does not complain, when there are missing
perl-packages.

Thanks for the hints.
juh

-- 
juh's Sudelbuch --- Literatur und Satire per E-Mail
http://www.sudelbuch.de
Unterstützen Sie das Sudelbuch durch eine Spende.
http://www.sudelbuch.de/spende.html

______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com