[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ISOTIME should have ISO format...
- From: Roland Rosenfeld <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:06:13 +0100
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Anthony Fok wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 06:28:00PM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> > I noted, that the so called ISOTIME in WML has the format
> > dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm:ss
> > yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss
> BTW, Roland made the above patch for wml_1.7.4-6.2 in Debian
> unstable.
I'm not the Debian maintainer of WML and I didn't upload the above
mentioned version (it's only a local build). My Debian wishilist bug
report wasn't forwarded to this mailing list, so I decided to post it
myself here...
> And indeed, this was recently implemented in WML 1.99.1 too. :-)
Great! I didn't saw this in the changelog of 1.99...
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
* roland@spinnaker.de * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager majordomo@engelschall.com