Re: [wml] Re: WML 2.0.1

[Jan Holler <nospam@thanx>]

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:20:21 +0200 (MET DST), Tobias Oetiker wrote:

> Today you sent me mail regarding [wml] Re: WML 2.0.1:
> 
> *> > So, therefore I've the following suggestion: let's us speak about the
> *> > grammar of mp4h before producing three other versions in sequence with
> *> > changing syntax...
> 
> OK folks, the problem here is that we have a multi pass compiler
> where the individual passes do not know about each other ... 
> 
> lets have an example .... <BLA></BLA> and <BLB></BLB> are complex
> tags both defined in mp4h:
> 
> 
> 1) <H1>hello<BLA>hello</H1></BLA>

Just one question to most of your examples: What about:

<h1>hello<bla>hello</bla></h1>

There are style-guides which consider your example as bad.
Look at tidy (wml_aux_tidy).

Cheers
 -jan



______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com