[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Idea how not to need future enhancement of WML - Environment
- From: Denis Barbier <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:24:28 +0200
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 10:29:42PM +0200, Matthias Bernhardt wrote:
[...]
> Surely it's a bit more complicated but after those last weeks of
> detail discussions how to implement that new mp4h stuff, I'm
> afraid this list would turn into a OOP-principles-lounge if
> that's gonna be implemented, too.
I disagree, my request for comments have nothing to do with OOP.
Web languages evolve, XML will be the de facto standard in (near ?)
future, and i believe that WML should take these changes into
consideration to be XML-ready. Do not misunderstand this point, HTML
support is the priority, but i try to provide XML features whenever
possible (i.e. when there is no conflict with HTML syntax).
--
Denis Barbier
WML Maintainer
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager majordomo@engelschall.com