Re: [wml] Re: [wml] Re: 2.0.3 - bug or feature

[Fritz Zaucker <nospam@thanx>]

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Denis Barbier wrote:

> Think also about the WML 1.x -> WML.1.99.x -> WML 2.x transition, most
> complaints went out when 2.0 was released (i do not try to apologize or
> justify myself, but only to understand how to make WML releases more
> robust).

I think you have always correctly pointed out what your development
schedule is and I would consider everything between 1.7.4 (or so) and
2.0 as more or less experimental. I think this was communicated to the
users of WML as was the fact that the rewrite of meta-html and other
changes will bring incompatibilities with earlier versions.

So, just keep going doing a great job!

Cheers,
Fritz

-- 
Dr. Fritz Zaucker, Head IT Support Group
Department of Electrical Engineering,  Federal Institute of Technology
ETZ J97, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Tel.: +41-1-632-5241 Fax: +41-1-632-1194 http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~zaucker/
E-mail: zaucker@ee.ethz.ch (see home page for PGP key)

______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com