Re: m4 und divert

[Denis Barbier <nospam@thanx>]

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:29:56PM +0100, Philipp Meisen wrote:
> Could someone gibe me an example, why I should use divert and m4?
> 
> Here my example, why I ask
> 
> with divert:
> {#TEST#:lalala:##}
> 
> Ausgabe: {#TEST#}
> 
> with m4:
> m4_define(TEST, lalala)
> 
> Ausgabe: TEST
> 
> I mean where is the different? In my opinion everything I can realize with m4 I also can realize with divert...

As m4 has also its own diversions, I too believe that everything done
with wml_p5_divert can be done with m4.
But at least you do not have to learn m4 and spend time trying to figure
why certain constructs do not work as expected.

-- 
Denis Barbier
WML Maintainer
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com