[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

toc etc



Hi Collegues,

i would think that for professional projects wml::std::toc is not satisfactory 
just because it allows only for the 5 built-in styles. Of course, those styles 
have many options, but they do not cover all situations (for instance, what if 
I wish to render toc using CSS only?).

I would think that something like this should be much better: instead of <toc> 
to have

<toc-style name="ol"> ;;; predefined tag for the 'ol' style
;;; here we optionally redefine some styles
<toc_h4_style> <li><a href="#%toc_href%" class="myh4class">%toc_title%</a> 
</toc_h4_style>
.
.
.
<toc>

That is, we can define our own style and use a standard one as a base.

The same should be applicable to other standard includes as well: 
many of them are not flexible enough (and this should stop many potential
wml-users (not wml-programmers) from using it).

What do you think?

--
Petr


______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com