[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: My previous patch...
- From: Denis Barbier <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 15:57:55 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Thomas Akin wrote:
> I made the change so that if $base was set to a
> directory then the image file would be created as
> $base/filename.imgdot.gif rather than the previous
> $base/.imgdot.gif
>
> I'm not sure I understand why it would only apply to
> gfont? Why only gfont?
Because when you create multiple images with gfont, you have to specify
a unique file name for each string. With other include files (logo,
imgbg, imgdot) the situation is different. I see no reason to have
file1.logo-wml.gif file2.logo-wml.gif file3.logo-wml.gif ...
because all these files are identical, so why not just "logo-wml.gif" ?
So i think the current implementation of these include files is wrong.
--
Denis Barbier
WML Maintainer
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager majordomo@engelschall.com