[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: My previous patch...
- From: Thomas Akin <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 16:57:02 -0500
Denis,
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Because when you create multiple images with gfont, you have to specify
> a unique file name for each string. With other include files (logo,
> imgbg, imgdot) the situation is different. I see no reason to have
> file1.logo-wml.gif file2.logo-wml.gif file3.logo-wml.gif ...
> because all these files are identical, so why not just "logo-wml.gif" ?
>
> So i think the current implementation of these include files is wrong.
When looking at things I got the impression that
there was a lot of redundant file creation, but I
didn't look into it too deeply and just assumed that
it was done for a good reason... and like all good
assumptions this one seems to have been wrong...
After a cursory check of the include files
std::logo
des::imgdot
des::imgbg
I don't see any reasons not to simply create one
image rather than redundant images on a per file
basis. From what I can see the filename is not
needed for uniqueness.
You are probably the best judge about whether this
would actually work... If so it would certainly make
things much cleaner... If you can't think of any
reasons why it wouldn't work let me know and I'll
try to come up with a new set of patches....
(Without warning this might freak a few people out
though...)
Thanks,
Thomas
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Akin Kennesaw State University
Networking Instructor Continuing Education
CNX, CSA, ICS 1000 Chastain Road
takin@kennesaw.edu Kennesaw, GA 30144-5591
---------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager majordomo@engelschall.com